Floor-level Contamination in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

contamination in pharmaceutical manufacturing

Controlling contamination in pharmaceutical manufacturing often focuses on eye-level or operational areas, leaving floor-level contamination underappreciated. However, overlooking this aspect can compromise product safety and facility hygiene. Addressing floor-level contaminants is crucial for maintaining sterile conditions, meeting regulatory standards, and ensuring the quality of pharmaceutical products.


This blog is based on a recap of our recent e-book written by Alun Jones, Dycem’s VP of Sales for USA. To read the full e-book, click here.


1. Understanding Sources and Types of Floor-Level Contamination

Contaminants can originate from numerous sources in cleanroom environments. Often, contamination isn’t confined to what is immediately visible or noticeable. According to industry studies, a staggering 80% of contaminants infiltrate critical areas via shoes or wheels. This fact alone highlights the urgent need for robust floor-level contamination controls.

Potential Contaminants Include:

  • Microbiological Agents: Bacteria, mold, and viruses can infiltrate cleanrooms through environmental exposure and human movement. Identifying the sources of these microbes is critical, as it informs proper sanitation methods.
  • Particulate Matter: Dust, human skin flakes, and fibers from gowns or cleaning materials all accumulate at floor level with the help of gravity. Trolley wheels and heavy equipment can grind larger particles into smaller, more easily airborne ones, exacerbating the risk.

While air handling systems are intended to maintain sterile conditions, poor management can unintentionally lead to floor-level contamination. As particles settle, they may be crushed and spread by regular foot and equipment traffic, turning floors into a continuous source of contamination.


2. Particle Behavior: Settling and Brownian Motion

Understanding the science of particle movement is fundamental to addressing contamination effectively.

Particle Settling Dynamics

In controlled environments, only a tiny fraction of particles settle directly onto the floor. Most particles remain airborne, swirling with even the slightest disturbance, such as a passing person or equipment movement. When these particles land on the floor and are later disturbed, they can fragment into smaller sizes, becoming even more complicated to manage.

Brownian Motion

Particles smaller than one micron pose a unique challenge. Their minuscule size makes them nearly immune to gravity, keeping them suspended in the air and moving unpredictably due to Brownian motion. In pharmaceutical manufacturing, this random movement complicates contamination control efforts. Minor disturbances, like machinery vibrations or foot traffic, can cause these particles to re-enter the cleanroom’s critical zones.


3. Current Control Methods and Their Limitations

Traditional methods for controlling floor-level contamination have been widely used for years, but they have considerable limitations that affect their effectiveness and safety.

Peel-Off Mats: Pros and Cons

Peel-off or sticky mats are the most common floor-level contamination control methods. They consist of multiple layers of adhesive-coated plastic sheets designed to trap contaminants from footwear and wheels. When one layer becomes saturated, it is peeled away to expose a new one.

  • Pros: These mats are inexpensive, disposable, and easy to install. They are widely used because they offer a simple, practical solution for high-traffic areas.
  • Cons: However, peel-off mats come with significant drawbacks.
    • In some cases, saturated mats may transfer contaminants back onto footwear.
    • Peeling away a layer can generate airborne particles, undermining the cleanliness they aim to maintain.
    • Peel-off mats are only practical for the first few footfalls, as they lose adhesive power quickly.

Health and Safety Risks

Peel-off mats can create tripping hazards, especially if detached from the floor. Removing adhesive layers requires bending and physical effort, which can lead to fatigue or discomfort for staff. Their frequent need for replacement also makes them labor-intensive and costly over time.

Environmental Impact

Peel-off mats are not environmentally friendly. Made from non-recyclable materials, they contribute significantly to contaminated plastic waste. One study found that a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility using peel-off mats in 10 locations could generate up to 70,000 kg of CO2 from the production process. The production and disposal processes further increase the facility’s carbon footprint, highlighting the need for more sustainable alternatives.

Floor-level Contamination in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing


4. Advanced Solutions: Polymeric Mats

Polymeric mats have emerged as a superior solution for floor-level contamination control. Unlike peel-off mats, these are made from durable, non-toxic polymeric materials that can trap contaminants without constant replacement.

Why Polymeric Mats Excel

  1. Higher Efficacy: Scientific studies indicate that polymeric mats can reduce foot- and wheel-borne contamination by up to 99%, compared to the mere 27% effectiveness of sticky mats (Clibbon, 2002). Their design allows for optimal particle capture without the risk of redistribution.
  2. Long Lifespan: With proper maintenance, these mats can last 3-5 years, drastically reducing replacement costs. They can also integrate into standard cleaning procedures and drastically reduce the amount of plastic waste produced.
  3. Customizable and Secure Installation: Polymeric mats can be customized to fit any room layout, providing comprehensive coverage. Proper installation prevents bypassing, ensuring that all traffic contacts the mat’s surface for effective decontamination.

5. The Economic and Environmental Benefits of Polymeric Mats

While the initial cost of polymeric mats is higher than traditional options, the long-term savings are considerable.

Cost-Effectiveness

At first glance, polymeric contamination control mats may seem to have a higher upfront cost than traditional peel-off mats. However, when analyzing the mats’ typical lifespan of 3-5 years, most facilities will experience significant cost savings. This long-term value becomes particularly clear when considering the recurring expenses associated with peel-off mats, which require constant replacement and disposal.

Environmental Responsibility

Switching to polymeric mats aligns with sustainability goals. By minimizing plastic waste, facilities can significantly lower their environmental impact. Additionally, polymeric mats are easy to clean and maintain, requiring no special disposal methods. This makes them a more environmentally responsible choice for contamination control.


6. Best Practices for Sanitation and Monitoring

Even with advanced floor mats, a robust sanitation and monitoring system is essential to control contamination.

Effective Decontamination Techniques

  • Sterilants and Disinfectants: Hydrogen peroxide vapor, chlorine dioxide gas, and UV-C light are effective for comprehensive floor-level cleaning. Each method has its strengths; for instance, UV-C light is excellent for killing microorganisms but only works in direct-contact areas.
  • Routine Monitoring: It is crucial to implement environmental monitoring programs that include floor swabs and particle counts. Monitoring helps identify contamination sources and ensures that cleaning protocols are effective.

Checklist for Sanitation Measures

  • Does the method kill the targeted contaminants effectively?
  • Is there full coverage, including cracks and crevices?
  • Does the method ensure adequate contact time without damaging equipment?

By addressing these questions, facilities can develop more effective cleaning and monitoring protocols tailored to their unique needs.


7. Conclusion: Investing in Robust Contamination Control

Floor-level contamination in pharmaceutical environments is a serious risk that can no longer be ignored. Manufacturers can ensure product safety and regulatory compliance by investing in modern solutions like polymeric mats and refining decontamination and monitoring strategies.

While traditional peel-off mats may seem like an easy fix, they come with hidden costs and environmental concerns. Polymeric mats, although more expensive upfront, offer a more reliable and sustainable long-term solution. Combined with comprehensive monitoring and sanitation protocols, these innovations help create a cleaner, safer, and more efficient manufacturing environment.

Adopting a robust contamination control strategy isn’t just about meeting guidelines; it’s about protecting public health, reducing waste, improving product quality, and enhancing operational efficiency. Every measure taken counts in a field where even the smallest contaminant can have devastating consequences.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

📖 Loved this blog? Dive deeper into the topic by reading the full e-book here.

🔍 Interested in enhancing your contamination control? Contact us today for a consultation on how our polymeric mats can transform your cleanroom environment!

🌱 Join the movement towards sustainability in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Explore our solutions and make the switch to a greener future!